Loading...
Loading...Loading...
Loading...There is a modest pricing gap between these firms. FunderPro Futures comes in at $79 for the $50K evaluation while the other charges $130 — a $51 difference. That is roughly the cost of a reset at most firms, so it is worth factoring in if you budget for multiple attempts. Check available Lucid Trading discount codes for additional savings.
The profit split gap is notable. Lucid Trading returns 90% of your profits, putting $900 in your pocket for every $1,000 earned. The other firm's 80% split means you would receive $800 on that same amount — a $100 per-thousand difference that scales with every payout.
Lucid Trading requires fewer minimum trading days (2 vs 3).
Lucid Trading has no daily loss limit, whereas FunderPro Futures restricts daily losses to $1,000. FunderPro Futures permits news trading while Lucid Trading restricts it. These operational differences can shape your day-to-day experience, particularly if your strategy depends on volatility around economic releases or requires more intraday flexibility.
These two firms take meaningfully different approaches to their challenge programs. The right pick depends on what you prioritize: lower cost of entry, a bigger share of profits, or more lenient risk parameters. Consider which rules align with how you actually trade, not just which numbers look best on paper.
View the full details on each firm's page: FunderPro Futures rules & pricing and Lucid Trading rules & pricing.
| Rule | FunderPro Futures | Lucid Trading |
|---|---|---|
| News Trading | Allowed | Not allowed |
| Weekend Holding | Not allowed | Not allowed |
| Overnight Holding | Not allowed | Not allowed |
| Hedging | Not allowed | Not allowed |
| Copy Trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Expert Advisors (EAs) | Allowed | Allowed |
Rules shown reflect the $50K challenge account. Some rules may differ by account size or type.
The best prop firm depends on your experience level, trading style, and priorities. Here is how FunderPro Futures and Lucid Trading stack up for different types of traders.
New to prop firms and want to minimize risk while learning the ropes.
FunderPro Futures
Consistent track record, focused on maximizing earnings and scaling capital.
Lucid Trading
Prefer wider stops, lower risk, and the flexibility to hold positions longer.
FunderPro Futures
FunderPro Futures charges $79 for their $50K challenge (plus a $129 activation fee once funded), compared to $130 at Lucid Trading. That is a $51 savings upfront.
Lucid Trading leads with a 90% profit split compared to 80% at FunderPro Futures. On a $2,000 profit, that means $1800 in your pocket at Lucid Trading versus $1600 at FunderPro Futures.
Both firms set the max drawdown at $2,000.
FunderPro Futures allows news trading on funded accounts, but Lucid Trading restricts it. If your strategy relies on trading around economic releases like NFP or FOMC, FunderPro Futures is the clear pick.
Payout timelines are similar at both firms, typically requiring around 3 profitable trading days. Both support multiple withdrawal methods.
FunderPro Futures enforces a 45% consistency rule — no single day can account for more than 45% of your total earnings. Lucid Trading has no such rule, giving you freedom to have outsized winning days without penalty.
For beginners, FunderPro Futures has an edge thanks to lower challenge fee. These features reduce the pressure while you are still developing consistency. That said, both firms are viable — the best choice depends on your specific trading approach and budget.
Data is updated regularly but may not reflect the latest changes. Always verify current pricing and rules on each firm's official website before making a decision.
Detailed side-by-side comparison of FunderPro Futures and Lucid Trading $50K challenge accounts. Compare fees, profit splits, drawdown rules, and more.