Find futures prop firms with no activation fees. Compare firms that waive this charge and see how their accounts, rules, and payout structures compare.
Kane Simons (TraderKane) is the founder of Prop Firm Compare and a futures trader with 10+ years’ experience. Having earned $3.5M in prop firm payouts, he provides unbiased reviews, comparisons, and insights based on real trading experience.
What are perpetual futures? Compare Nasdaq-100 and S&P 500 perps with
CME NQ and ES futures: funding vs rollover, hours, leverage, liquidation and
regulation.
Compare CFD vs futures prop firms, including position sizing, costs, trading rules and market structure to see which may suit beginner traders.
September 4, 202611 min read
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to optimize your browsing experience, personalize content, and measure the effectiveness of ads. Read our cookie policy.
Finding the right no activation fee futures prop firms can cut hundreds of dollars from your total cost of getting funded.
Most traders focus on the headline evaluation price. But the activation fee, charged after you pass, is where many firms quietly add to the bill.
This guide compares the best futures prop firms that remove that extra barrier. It breaks down cost structures and explains the rule differences that matter before you commit to a challenge.
What Is a No Activation Fee Futures Prop Firm?
When you join a futures prop firm, you pay an evaluation fee to enter a challenge. If you pass, some firms charge a second fee before opening your funded account.
That second charge is the activation fee. It is separate from the evaluation itself and can range from $130 to over $200 depending on the firm.
No activation fee futures prop firms skip that charge entirely. Once you pass, your funded account opens with no additional payment required.
It helps to understand how activation fees differ from other costs:
Evaluation fee: The recurring monthly or one-time fee paid to take the challenge
Activation fee: A separate one-time charge assessed after passing, before the funded account opens
Reset fee: Paid to restart a failed evaluation or funded account
Monthly subscription: Ongoing billing during the evaluation phase, separate from activation
Avoiding activation fees reduces the true cost of becoming funded. This matters most for traders running multiple accounts or making multiple challenge attempts.
How We Ranked the Best No Activation Fee Futures Prop Firms
Every firm on this list charges $0 to activate a funded account. Rankings are then based on factors that determine real-world value:
Total cost to funded status: Evaluation fee structure, one-time vs. monthly pricing, and reset costs
Drawdown structure: EOD trailing vs. intraday trailing, and how quickly the floor locks
Profit split: Percentage retained by the trader and any bonus tiers
Payout frequency and access: Minimum days required, caps, and payout cycle mechanics
Consistency rule strictness: Whether rules restrict large single-day performance
Platform support: Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader, and others
Firm reputation: Trustpilot scores, documented payout history, and community feedback
Rankings reflect cost transparency and rule structure, not marketing claims or current discount pricing.
My Funded Futures (MFFU) currently offers three plans: Rapid, Flex, and Pro. All charge $0 to activate a funded account.
Flex is the most affordable entry point, starting at $49 (25K) and $107 (50K) using code LAB. Rapid starts at $125.60 for a 50K account using code LAB, with 100K at $213.60 and 150K at $277.60.
Pro starts at $227 (50K), $344 (100K), and $477 (150K). Pro includes a free "One Day to Pass" add-on with no consistency rule and a $4,000 profit target.
There are no hidden transition fees. Passing the evaluation moves you directly into the funded stage.
Drawdown Structure
Flex and Pro use EOD trailing drawdown. The floor updates once daily at session close and does not move intraday.
Rapid uses intraday trailing drawdown, which tracks your equity peak in real time. This creates a tighter risk environment during live sessions.
All funded accounts lock drawdown once the account clears the starting balance buffer.
Payout Model
Payouts are available every five winning days across all plans. A 40% consistency rule applies in the funded phase for Rapid and Flex, meaning no single day's profit can exceed 40% of total gains within a payout cycle.
Pro's "One Day to Pass" add-on removes the consistency rule entirely during the evaluation. Check current funded account terms for Pro consistency rule status.
Best For
Flex suits budget-conscious traders who want a low one-time entry fee and EOD drawdown. Pro suits traders who want to pass quickly with no consistency restrictions during the evaluation phase.
Limitations
Rapid uses intraday trailing drawdown in the funded stage, which is a stricter environment than EOD. The 40% consistency rule on Rapid and Flex funded accounts can slow payout cycles for traders with strong single-day sessions.
2. Tradeify (Growth and Select)
Evaluation Fee
$139/month (Growth 50K), $159/month (Select 50K)
Activation Fee
$0 on all plans
Account Sizes
$50K, $100K, $150K
Drawdown Type
EOD trailing (all plans)
Profit Split
90/10 (funded, all plans)
Platforms
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Quantower
Cost Structure
Tradeify charges zero activation fees across Growth, Select, and Lightning plans. Monthly subscriptions end automatically once you pass.
There are no ongoing fees on funded accounts. Growth starts at $139/month for a $50K evaluation. Select starts at $159/month.
Reset fees are $85 (50K), $169 (100K), and $189 (150K).
Drawdown Structure
All Tradeify plans use EOD trailing drawdown, updating only at the 5:00 PM ET session close.
An intraday loss that fully recovers before the close has no impact on the drawdown floor. This is a meaningful structural advantage over intraday trailing models.
Growth funded accounts lock the drawdown floor at $100 above starting balance once the account crosses that threshold.
Payout Model
Growth funded accounts require five profitable days before the first payout. Minimum daily profits are $150 (50K), $200 (100K), or $250 (150K). A 35% funded consistency rule applies per cycle.
Select Flex removes the consistency rule entirely after passing. Payouts are available every five winning days, with caps of $3,000/$4,000/$5,000 per cycle.
Select Daily allows payouts every trading day once a buffer is built, with smaller per-day caps.
After five total payouts on any plan, traders qualify for Tradeify Elite, which provides access to live CME capital accounts.
Best For
Traders who value EOD drawdown mechanics and want a clear path to live capital. Select Flex suits traders with large single-day sessions who want to avoid funded consistency penalties.
Limitations
Growth funded accounts carry a 35% consistency rule limiting single-day profit concentration. Select requires a minimum of three trading days to pass due to its 40% evaluation consistency rule. Progressive position scaling applies in funded accounts.
3. Lucid Trading (LucidPro and LucidFlex)
Evaluation Fee
From $129.50 one-time (LucidPro 50K) / From $175 one-time (LucidFlex 50K)
Activation Fee
$0 on both plans
Account Sizes
$25K, $50K, $100K, $150K
Drawdown Type
EOD trailing (both plans)
Profit Split
100% first $10K then 90/10 (LucidPro) / 90/10 from first payout (LucidFlex)
Platforms
Tradovate, Rithmic, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart
Cost Structure
Lucid Trading uses a one-time evaluation fee model with no monthly subscription and no activation fee.
You pay once, take as long as you need to pass, and move directly to funded status. LucidPro starts at $129.50 for a 50K evaluation. LucidFlex starts at $175 for the same size.
Neither plan charges monthly billing or an activation fee at any stage.
Drawdown Structure
Both plans use EOD trailing drawdown. The max loss limit starts $2,000 below the starting balance on a 50K account and trails upward with each daily closing high-water mark.
It does not move intraday, giving traders full flexibility to manage positions through volatility. The floor locks permanently once the closing balance exceeds the starting balance plus the drawdown amount.
Payout Model
LucidPro offers 3-day payout cycles with a 100% profit split on the first $10,000 withdrawn, then 90/10 after that. This is one of the more favorable early-payout structures in the space.
LucidFlex uses 5-day payout cycles with a flat 90/10 split from the first withdrawal. There is no funded consistency rule, meaning a single strong session can represent most of a cycle's profit without penalty.
LucidFlex allows six total payouts before transitioning to LucidLive.
Best For
LucidPro suits traders with a consistent strategy who want the fastest path to payouts. LucidFlex suits traders who need full intraday flexibility and want zero funded consistency restrictions.
Limitations
LucidPro has a daily loss limit that can be a disadvantage for traders who experience volatile intraday swings. No overnight or weekend holds are permitted on sim-funded accounts.
Lucid Trading launched in 2025, making it newer than established competitors. Its 4.8/5 Trustpilot rating reflects a strong early track record, but less documented history than older firms.
4. Take Profit Trader (with No-Fee Promo)
Evaluation Fee
From $150/month (standard), discounted with code LAB
Tradovate, Rithmic, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, and 10+ others
Cost Structure
Take Profit Trader typically charges a $130 one-time activation fee after passing. Using code LAB waives this fee entirely.
With the evaluation discount and no activation fee applied via code LAB, a $50K account can be entered significantly below standard pricing if passed within the first month.
There are no monthly fees on PRO funded accounts. Standard monthly evaluation pricing runs $170 (50K), $330 (100K), and $360 (150K) without promotions.
Drawdown Structure
The evaluation uses EOD trailing drawdown, updating once at session close. PRO funded accounts switch to intraday trailing drawdown, tracking equity in real time during the session.
Traders who prefer EOD drawdown throughout should consider upgrading to PRO+. PRO+ uses EOD drawdown, has no buffer zone requirement, and runs on live CME execution.
Payout Model
PRO accounts allow withdrawals from day one of the funded account, provided the balance exceeds the buffer zone. The buffer is equal to the maximum drawdown amount.
An 80/20 split applies until PRO+ invitation, which is triggered after $5,000 in cumulative profits. PRO+ upgrades at no additional cost with a 90/10 split, daily payouts, and no restrictions.
There is no consistency rule at any stage.
Best For
Traders who want immediate withdrawal access after passing and are using code LAB to eliminate the activation fee. The absence of a daily loss limit makes this a flexible entry option.
Limitations
The no-activation-fee status at TPT requires code LAB at checkout. Standard pricing includes a $130 activation fee.
PRO funded accounts use intraday trailing drawdown, which is stricter than the EOD model applied during the evaluation. News trading requires closing positions one minute before and after FOMC, NFP, and CPI releases on funded accounts.
Quick Cost Comparison
The table below compares the minimum total cost to a funded account at the $50K level for each firm. Minimum cost assumes passing on the first attempt within the first billing period where applicable. Keep in mind these are base prices and the LAB code discount is not reflected.
Activation fees are easy to overlook when comparing prop firms, but they affect the real total cost of getting funded.
On a $50K account, a standard $130 activation fee can equal 75 to 100% of the evaluation fee itself on discounted plans.
For traders who fail and retry, that cost doubles or triples. And if a trader passes, activates, then breaches a funded account rule, the activation fee becomes a recurring expense each time they restart.
There is also a mental side to this. Passing an evaluation is already the hardest part. Being asked to pay another fee before trading funded capital adds friction and can shake confidence going into early funded sessions.
Removing the activation fee also keeps more money available for trading, resets, or additional accounts. For traders running multiple accounts at once, those savings add up fast.
Are No Activation Fee Futures Prop Firms Better?
Not automatically. But they remove one variable that inflates total cost without adding real value.
Advantages of no activation fee models:
Lower total cost to funded status
Simpler transition from evaluation to funded trading
Reduced financial pressure immediately after passing
Potential trade-offs:
Some no-activation-fee firms charge higher monthly evaluation fees to offset the removed cost
Rule structures may be stricter elsewhere, including consistency rules, payout buffers, or contract limits
Not all firms waive the fee permanently; some do so only through promotions
The key question is not whether a firm charges an activation fee. It is what the total cost looks like from evaluation start to first payout.
A firm that waives activation but charges $250/month may cost more overall than a firm charging $130 to activate after a $49/month evaluation, depending on how long it takes to pass.
Traders should always read the full rulebook before choosing a firm based on any single cost factor.
Who Should Choose a No Activation Fee Futures Prop Firm?
Well-suited for:
New traders still refining their strategy who expect multiple evaluation attempts before passing
Cost-sensitive traders managing a limited challenge budget
Traders planning to run multiple accounts at once, where activation fees would add up across each account
Traders who want a transparent cost structure with no surprises after passing
Less suited for:
Traders focused on instant funding models, where evaluation phases are bypassed entirely
Traders prioritizing the absolute lowest evaluation fee, which may be found at firms that charge activation but offer deeply discounted monthly rates
Prop Firm Compare's Verdict
The best no activation fee futures prop firms deliver what the name promises: a direct path from evaluation to funded trading with no hidden costs at the transition point.
Among the firms ranked here, MFFU Flex offers one of the lowest one-time entry costs in the space. Tradeify Select Flex provides the cleanest funded rule set once you pass. Lucid Trading stands out for its one-time fee model that removes monthly billing entirely.
Total cost and drawdown structure remain the most important factors in any prop firm decision. Activation fee status matters most when multiplied across multiple accounts or repeated attempts.
Before selecting a challenge, review each firm's full profile. Pay close attention to payout caps, consistency rules, reset costs, and the drawdown mechanics that apply in the funded stage, not just during the evaluation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an activation fee in a prop firm challenge?
An activation fee is a one-time charge some prop firms collect after a trader passes their evaluation and before the funded account is opened.
It is separate from the evaluation fee and typically ranges from $130 to over $200. No activation fee firms eliminate this cost entirely, allowing traders to move directly from passing to funded trading without an additional payment.
Do all futures prop firms charge activation fees?
No. A growing number of futures prop firms have eliminated activation fees as part of a broader push toward transparent pricing.
MFFU, Tradeify, and Lucid Trading charge $0 for funded account activation on all plans. Take Profit Trader's standard structure includes a $130 activation fee, but code LAB waives it.
Firms like Apex Trader Funding still charge activation fees on most standard plans, though heavy discounts are common during promotions.
Are no activation fee prop firms cheaper overall?
Not always. Some firms waive the activation fee but charge higher monthly evaluation fees or impose stricter payout caps.
To assess true total cost, calculate the full expense from evaluation start to first payout, including monthly fees, any reset costs, and the activation fee. A $49/month evaluation with a $130 activation fee may still be cheaper than a $159/month plan with no activation fee, depending on how quickly you pass.
What is the difference between an evaluation fee and an activation fee?
The evaluation fee is paid upfront to enter the challenge phase. It grants access to the simulated trading account and is typically charged monthly or as a one-time fee.
The activation fee, where charged, is a separate payment made only after successfully passing the evaluation. It functions as a setup or onboarding charge before the funded account becomes active. No activation fee firms only charge the evaluation fee.
Do no activation fee firms still charge reset fees?
Most do. Reset fees apply when a funded or evaluation account is failed and the trader wants to restart without purchasing a new evaluation.
At Tradeify, resets cost $85 to $189 depending on account size. MFFU funded accounts cannot be reset; a new evaluation is required. Lucid Trading uses one-time evaluation fees, so resets require a new purchase rather than a separate reset fee. These costs are independent of activation fee structure.
Can you withdraw profits immediately after passing?
It depends on the firm and plan. Take Profit Trader allows withdrawal from day one of the funded account, provided the balance exceeds the buffer zone equal to the maximum drawdown.
Tradeify Growth requires five profitable trading days before the first payout. LucidPro requires a three-day payout cycle. MFFU Rapid and Flex require five winning days before the first withdrawal. No firm offers truly immediate withdrawal without qualifying conditions.
Are no activation fee prop firms reliable?
Activation fee policy has no direct relationship to payout reliability. The firms ranked here all have documented payout histories, active trader communities, and Trustpilot ratings of 4.4 or higher.
Reliability should be assessed based on payout track record, rule transparency, and community feedback rather than fee structure alone. Newer firms carry more uncertainty regardless of their fee model.
