FTMO vs Propr

Cost is one of the clearest differentiators here. FTMO undercuts the competition significantly at $83.30 versus $196 — a $112.70 gap on the $50K challenge alone. For a trader planning two or three attempts, that could mean saving $225.40 to $338.10 in total fees. Check available FTMO discount codes and Propr discount codes for additional savings.

The profit split gap is notable. FTMO returns 90% of your profits, putting $900 in your pocket for every $1,000 earned. The other firm's 80% split means you would receive $800 on that same amount — a $100 per-thousand difference that scales with every payout.

FTMO provides $2,000 of drawdown room compared to $1,500 — an extra $500 buffer that can be the difference between surviving a losing streak and blowing an account. Propr's static (doesn't trail) drawdown is more favorable than FTMO's end-of-day trailing calculation, giving you steadier risk limits during profitable runs.

FTMO sets the bar lower with a $3,000 profit target versus $4,500. Additionally, Propr has no minimum day requirement — you can pass as fast as you trade — whereas FTMO mandates at least 3 days.

FTMO does not enforce a daily loss limit while Propr caps daily losses at $1,500. These operational differences can shape your day-to-day experience, particularly if your strategy depends on volatility around economic releases or requires more intraday flexibility.

These two firms take meaningfully different approaches to their challenge programs. The right pick depends on what you prioritize: lower cost of entry, a bigger share of profits, or more lenient risk parameters. Consider which rules align with how you actually trade, not just which numbers look best on paper.